i need help with my final project for network enterprise solutions

IT Consulting Proposal

For this assignment, assume you have been hired by Kris Corporation as an Information Technology consultant. Kris Corporation manufacturers parts for the automotive industry. Your job is to submit a proposal that meets their criteria (listed below) based on information provided. You may fill in any gaps in the specifications provided by making assumptions. All assumptions should be clearly identified.

Current Implementation and Concerns:

  • Parent domain (kris.local) and child domain (corp.kris.local) for the organization’s AD infrastructure are running on Server 2012. The following are concerns related to AD: (1) Kris Corporation is concerned about running multiple domain, and (2) automobile manufacturers are asking Kris Corporation to use single identity to procure orders in real time.
  • The company has five locations: Atlanta (GA), Baltimore (MD), Chicago (IL), Seattle (WA) and San Diego (CA). The manufacturing plants are in Atlanta and Seattle.
  • Disaster recovery is a big concern.
  • Physical space for servers is an issue at the Atlanta location.
  • Most of the IT staff is in Atlanta, which is the company’s headquarters, but other locations have significant IT personnel as well. Business personnel are similarly distributed across the company’s locations.
  • Since all locations are independently connected to the internet, file sharing is difficult among sites.

Your document should integrate the content presented in the course. The outline below provides required points to cover. You are free to add other related information.

Describe the technical and business reasons for each choice, citing other resources as appropriate. The Windows Server 2012 operating system should be used for all aspects of the solution. Each choice should be explained with technical and business reasoning. Solutions should be reasonably detailed.

Your solution should cover the following five numbered areas and associated bulleted items listed under each.

  1. Active Directory
  • Why and how should the company migrate to 2016 AD?
  • Should the company remain at multi-domain model or migrate to single domain?
  • What technology can provide single sign on? How will it be configured?
  1. DNS
  • Where should DNS servers reside?
  • What kind of DNS security can the DNS servers leverage?
  1. DHCP
  • Will a form of DHCP fault tolerance be implemented?
  • How can DHCP addresses be tracked?
  1. Hyper-V
  • Evaluate the pros and cons of implanting Hyper-V. Would it need clustering?
  • What features of Hyper-V can Kris Corporation leverage?
  1. Routing/Security
  • How can Kris Corporation improve its networking capabilities in terms of file sharing and security?

Submission Requirements:

  • The final submission should provide 8-10 pages in length (not counting title page, images, diagrams, tables, or quotations).
  • Support your proposed solution by citing and integrating at least one credible source that is not LabSim and not Wikipedia. Recommended sources include a best practice guide or reference from Microsoft, or an experienced provider of Microsoft solutions.
  • At least one diagram must be included (not counted toward the minimum length described above). You may include more.
  • Use terms, evidence, and concepts from class readings.
  • Your paper must be formatted according to CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements (Links to an external site.).
  • If you need assistance with your writing style, start with the links under the Research Help and Writing Help tabs on the CSU-Global Library’s (Links to an external site.)

Rubric

ITS430 Mod 8 PP

ITS430 Mod 8 PP
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of migrating to 2016 AD; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

 16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

 12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

 8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

The Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

 16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

 12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

 8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
40.0 to >32.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Provides strong or adequate thought, insight and analysis of concepts and applications regarding migration to 2016 AD.

 32.0 to >24.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis.

 24.0 to >16.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis.

 16.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate thought, insight and analysis.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation
40.0 to >32.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in network enterprise solutions.

 32.0 to >24.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

 24.0 to >16.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

 16.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Source Material
20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.

 16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

 12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

 8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements.

 16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; is in proper essay format. In a minor way, does not conform to project requirements.

 12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper essay format. In a significant way, does not conform to project requirements.

 8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper essay format. Does not conform to project requirements.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Style
20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.

 16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.

 12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.

 8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

 16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

 12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

 8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

20.0 pts

Total Points: 200.0

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

/by